Malaria drugs may soon find a new use for
treating aggressive brain tumors. Photo Courtesy of Pixabay
|
Glioblastoma, an aggressive type of brain tumor, is traditionally hard to treat because of how it uses a process known as autophagy to block efforts to destroy it. However, in a landmark case, doctors were able to use an autophagy-inhibiting drug, originally developed for malaria treatment, to stabilize a glioblastoma in a 26-year-old patient. The drug extended and improved the patient's life when all other treatment options failed.
Lisa Rosendahl was given only a few months to
live by her doctors after her brain cancer became resistant to chemotherapy and
then to targeted treatments.
The study described a new drug combination that
has stabilized Rosendahl’s disease and increased both the quantity and quality
of her life: Adding the anti-malaria drug chloroquine to her treatment stopped
an essential process that Rosendahl’s cancer cells had been using to resist
therapy, re-sensitizing her cancer to the targeted treatment that had
previously stopped working. Along with Rosendahl, two other brain cancer
patients were treated with the combination and both showed similar, dramatic
improvement.
“When I was 21 they found a large mass in my
brain and I had it resected right away. They tested it for cancer and it came
back positive,” Lisa said.
“Lisa is a young adult with a very strong will to
live. But it was a high-risk, aggressive glioblastoma and by the time we
started this work, she had already tried everything. For that population,
survival rates are dismal. Miraculously, she had a response to this
combination. Four weeks later, she could stand and had improved use of her
arms, legs and hands,” says paper first author Jean Mulcahy-Levy, MD,
investigator at the University of Colorado Cancer Center and pediatric
oncologist at Children’s Hospital Colorado.
The science behind the innovative, off-label use
of this malaria drug, chloroquine, was in large part built in the lab of Andrew
Thorburn, PhD, deputy director of the CU Cancer Center, where Mulcahy-Levy
worked as a postdoctoral fellow, starting in 2009. Thorburn’s lab studies a
cellular process called autophagy. From the Greek “to eat oneself,” autophagy
is a process of cellular recycling in which cell organelles called autophagosomes encapsulate extra or dangerous material and transport it to the
cell’s lysosomes for disposal.
In fact, the first description of autophagy
earned the 2016 Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology for its discoverer,
Yoshinori Ohsumi. Like tearing apart a Lego kit, autophagy breaks down unneeded
cellular components into building blocks of energy or proteins for use in
surviving times of low energy or staying safe from poisons and pathogens (among
other uses). Unfortunately, some cancers use autophagy to keep themselves safe
from treatments.
“My initial lab studies were kind of
disappointing. It didn’t look like there was much effect of autophagy
inhibition on pediatric brain tumors. But then we found that it wasn’t no
effect across the board — there were subsets of tumors in which inhibition was
highly effective,” Mulcahy-Levy says.
Mulcahy-Levy’s work with Thorburn (among others),
showed that cancers with mutations in the gene BRAF, and specifically those
with a mutation called BRAFV600E, were especially dependent on autophagy. In
addition to melanoma, in which this mutation was first described, epithelioid
glioblastomas are especially likely to carry BRAFV600E mutation.
With this new understanding, Mulcahy-Levy became
an essential link between Thorburn’s basic science laboratory and the clinical
practice of oncologist, Nicholas Foreman, MD, CU Cancer Center investigator and
creator of the pediatric neuro-oncology at Children’s Hospital Colorado, who
had been overseeing Lisa’s care.
After many surgeries, radiation treatments and
chemotherapy, Lisa had started the drug vermurafenib, which was originally developed
to treat BRAF+ melanoma and is now being tested in pediatric brain tumors.
Lisa’s experience on the drug was typical of patients with BRAF+ cancers who
are treated with BRAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib — after a period of
control, cancer develops additional genetic mechanisms to drive its growth and
survival and is able to progress past the initial drug.
At that point, one promising strategy is to
predict and/or test for new genetic dependencies and then treat any new
dependency with another targeted therapy. For example, many BRAF+ cancers
treated with BRAF inhibitors develop KRAS, NRAS, EGFR or PTEN changes that
drive their resistance, and treatments exist targeting many of these “escape
pathways.” However, some cancers develop multiple resistance mechanisms and
others evolve so quickly that it can be difficult to stay ahead of these
changes with the correct, next targeted treatment.
“It’s like that story of the boy who puts his
finger in the dam,” Mulcahy-Levy says. “Eventually you just can’t plug all the
holes.”
Instead of this genetic whack-a-mole, the group
chose to explore cellular mechanisms outside what can be a never-ending
sequence of new mutations.
“Pre-clinical and clinical experience invariably
shows that tumor cells rapidly evolve ways around inhibition of mutated kinase
pathways like the BRAF pathway targeted here,” the paper writes. “However,
based on our results, we hypothesize that by targeting an entirely different
cellular process, i.e. autophagy, upon which these same tumor cells rely, it
may be feasible to overcome such resistance and thus re-establish effective
tumor control.”
In other words, knowing that Lisa Rosendahl’s
tumor was positive for BRAFV600E mutation, and that this marked the tumor as
especially dependent on autophagy — and also knowing that traditional options
and even clinical trials were nonexistent — the group worked with Rosendahl and
her father, Greg, to add the autophagy-inhibiting drug chloroquine to her
treatment.
“In September 2015, the previous targeted drugs
weren’t working anymore,” says Greg Rosendahl. “Doctors gave Lisa less than 12
months to live. We took all our cousins up to Alaska for a final trip kind of
thing. Then they came up with this new combination including chloroquine.”
Vemurafenib had initially pushed Lisa’s cancer
past the tipping point of survival. Then the cancer had learned to use
autophagy to pull itself back from the brink. Now with chloroquine nixing
autophagy, vemurafenib started working again.
“My cancer got smaller, which is awesome for me,”
Lisa says.
“We have treated three patients with the
combination and all three have had a clinical benefit. It’s really exciting —
sometimes you don’t see that kind of response with an experimental treatment.
In addition to Lisa, another patient was on the combination two-and-a-half
years. She’s in college, excelling, and growing into a wonderful young adult,
which wouldn’t have happened if we hadn’t put her on this combination,”
Mulcahy-Levy says.
Lisa recently bought a new wheelchair so that she
could spend more time at the mall. She also applied for a handicap sticker to
make it easier for her to visit a nearby park with food trucks. “She wants to
get out and do more. She continues to have what she feels is a good quality of
life,” Mulcahy-Levy says.
Research accompanying these results in patients
implies that the addition of autophagy inhibition to targeted treatments may
have benefits beyond glioblastoma and beyond only BRAF+ cancers. Because
chloroquine has already earned FDA approval as a safe and effective (and
inexpensive) treatment for malaria, the paper points out that it should be
possible to “quickly test” the effectiveness of adding autophagy inhibition to
a larger sample of BRAF+ glioblastoma and other brain tumor patients, and also
to possibly expand this treatment to other likely mutations and disease sites.
As Mulcahy-Levy’s early studies show, many
cancers do not depend on autophagy. But at the same time, many do. Because a
safe and simple drug already exists to inhibit autophagy, the time between
discovering an autophagy-dependent cancer and the ability to add
autophagy-inhibiting chloroquine to a treatment regimen against this cancer may
be short.
“I really like being able to really tailor therapy
to the patient,” Mulcahy-Levy says. “I like saying, ‘I think this is going to
be really important to you,’ and not necessarily using the same treatment with
another patient whose cancer is driven by different genetic alterations. This
is the definition of patient-centered care — designing therapy based on that
individual patient’s information. It’s not just glioblastoma, but a certain
mutation and not just the mutation but a certain pattern of previous treatments
and resistance.”
“It makes me feel really lucky to be a pioneer in this treatment,” says Lisa Rosendahl. “I hope it helps and I hope it helps people down the road. I want it to help.”
No comments :
Post a Comment