Thursday, February 02, 2017

NEWS POST: Four Inventors, Whose Work Spans Over Three Decades, Win The Queen Elizabeth Prize For Engineering

This 1972 edition of Electronics magazine shows the blurred first image 
The Queen Elizabeth Prize is a global £1million (US$1.2million) prize that celebrates a ground-breaking innovation in engineering.

It has run since 2013, when the first prize was awarded to the creators of the Internet, the browser and the World Wide Web. 

The prize rewards an individual or team of engineers whose work has had a major impact on humanity.

The prize also celebrates engineering as a discipline and career choice in an attempt to get more young people involved in the subject.

Dr Michael Tompsett, pictured with wife Margaret, was one of four winners of the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering, netting the award for inventing the digital camera. He is shown here with his original camera
As the inventor of the digital camera, you’d think that Dr Michael Tompsett would be a
rather enthusiastic snapper.

But the man whose ideas led to Instagram and the cameraphone actually bemoans the very ‘selfie culture’ that he helped to create.

And the 77-year-old Briton, who was yesterday awarded the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering along with three others, has even admitted that at times he regrets inventing the device.

Speaking as he accepted the £1million award, the highest accolade for engineering, the pioneer admitted that he is irritated by people using digital cameras to take selfies.

He said: ‘I never take selfies. It’s totally unnecessary.

‘Here in London, for example, there are hordes of tourists even at this time of year and outside Westminster Abbey and the Houses of Parliament you can’t go anywhere without people standing in the middle of the pavement taking pictures and taking selfies, and shoving selfie sticks in front of you.

‘At that point I just say, “Why the hell did anybody invent this stuff?”

‘How many people look at their selfies? It’s just to prove they are at a particular location.

‘I don’t think you are doing justice either to yourself or to the location, frankly.’ 

Dr Tompsett, who was originally from Writtle, Essex, and now lives in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, added: ‘Of course, it’s generational. I’m in the older generation and younger folks are doing this all the time.’

And despite his invention making it possible to take large numbers of pictures, he prefers to stick to just taking one or two.

The Cambridge graduate added: ‘Film was expensive, and I used to develop and print the pictures myself as well and it took a lot of time. 

'I would compose pictures in various ways very carefully.

‘I still tend to do that. Even though I could take ten, 20, 100 on my phone now, I tend just to take one.’

However, despite his apparent hatred of selfies, Dr Tompsett seemed happy to make an exception yesterday – taking a snap with two of his fellow prize winners: Nobukazu Teranishi, of Japan, and Eric Fossum from the US.

The CMOS device, also known as 'camera on a chip' technology, now features in most modern digital cameras
In the 1970s and 80s, they, along with fourth prize recipient American George Smith, developed a series of electronic sensors that transformed digital imaging and made most film-based photography redundant.

It began in 1971, when Dr Tompsett, who was working at Bell Laboratories in the US, realized a device invented by colleagues for computer memory circuits could have another use: taking pictures.

Called a ‘charge-coupled device’, it converts light to an electrical signal.

And in 1972, his wife Margaret appeared in the first colour digital image – on the cover of the magazine International Electronics. 

Professor Teranishi invented a device called the pinned photodiode, or PPD, which allows higher resolution digital images.

And Professor Fossum came up with the complementary metal oxide semiconductor, or CMOS, which led to ‘a camera on a chip’.

The £1million (US$1.2million) Queen Elizabeth Prize this year went to the developers of technologies that convert light into digital signals. Princess Anne is pictured giving the prize to (left to right) Dr Michael Tompsett, Professor Nobukazu Teranishi, and Professor Eric Fossum
However, while a Briton had a key role in inventing the digital camera, the biggest beneficiaries may have been in Asia, where most of the devices are manufactured.

But it wouldn’t be the first time that a British invention was exploited worldwide.

Other UK electronic creations include the television, made in 1925 by John Logie Baird, and the first video recorder, called the Telcan, which was invented in 1963 by Norman Rutherford and Michael Turner of the Nottingham Electronic Valve Company.

Originally published on Daily Mail UK

Monday, January 30, 2017

Developing Inventive Creativity And Inventive Activity In Nigeria

NAIJAGRAPHITTI IMAGES BANK
By Kenneth Nwachinemelu David-Okafor

Kenneth Nwachinemelu David-Okafor
How many inventors are there in Nigeria?

Whatever you have guessed as the answer, know this: as long as your name is not in that number then I have a message for you: you can make yourself relevant in 2017 by becoming an inventor or encouraging someone you know to become one!

Think of the possibilities, what you could accomplish, what you could contribute or what the person you motivate could accomplish, could contribute to the growth and reputation of Nigeria.

The good news is that becoming an inventor is not impossible if you are prepared to put in the required diligence.

How?

Let me share this with you: who is an inventor?

Inventor  a person who brings ideas or objects together in a novel way to create an invention, something that did not exist before. 

The Encyclopaedia Britannica (2017) notes, “Inventors defy definition; as a result, they are frequently defined by what they are not. For example, though there is a close relation between invention and science and engineering, an inventor is not necessarily a scientist or an engineer. A scientist is said to be a discoverer—that is, somebody who by acute observation and brilliant analysis is able to find and explain something that already exists in nature. An engineer, meanwhile, uses existing technology and scientific understanding to design better objects or processes. But an inventor, it is said, creates something that had never previously existed.”

The University of Tennessee Research Foundation makes a very important distinction between who is an inventor and who is not an inventor. On the UT Research Foundation website, the author(s) writes, “Who is an inventor? - Basically, the inventors are all the people who contributed to the conception of the invention. Conception is the mental part of invention – formulating a mental representation of the means to achieve a desired result. While there may be considerable work involved in building and testing this mental representation to create a tangible invention (which is referred to as the “reduction to practice” in patent law), only individuals who contributed to the conception of the idea are inventors on the patent.

“Who is not an inventor? - An individual who was involved in the reduction to practice of an invention, but not the conception, is not an inventor. A department head or dean who did not have any direct role in the making of the invention is not an inventor. The sponsors who provided the funds supporting your work on the invention are not inventors. A colleague who generously provided materials for you to build or test your invention is not an inventor.”

So you can right from the bat that is someone who contributes to the conception of the invention. You therefore can get a feasible idea and get other professionals to build it! You do not need to be a scientist or an engineer to become an inventor!

If you are lacking ideas of areas in which you can develop an invention then I can share with you some key areas in which Nigeria has great needs.

There are ideas I have shared in an e-book (cover picture above) COMING OUT SOON: 

INVENTORS, INVENTIONS & INVENTIVE THINKING SHORTAGES
Key Reasons Why Nigeria Is Short Of Inventors
Cultural, Scientific, Educational, Environmental, Political and Other Factors Constraining Nigeria's Inventiveness and Inventive Endeavour

When I decided that it was not worth complaining about Nigeria when I get frustrated that nothing seems to change I decided that I would do something: I aspire to contribute to transform Nigeria from a rabidly consumerist country to a more productive and inventive country!

Please get this right, many people assume Nigeria is a creative country; and it is to the degree that it has a well-documented and vibrant creative industry sector BUT CREATIVITY IS SO MUCH MORE THAN MUSIC, NOLLYWOOD AND ENTERTAINMENT. More importantly, we, Nigerians, are not, I dare say, as imaginative as we pride ourselves. Through action research, I discovered that Nigeria’s education system and its operators have not prioritized the development of creativity across several disciplines (including inventive creativity), critical thinking and creative problem solving.

Let me present some hard facts before you:

o  Nigeria was awarded less than 10 U.S. patents per one million residents between 1985 and 2014. But just for 2014, China got 801,135; United States got 285,096; Russian Federation got 24,072; United Kingdom got 15,196; Israel got 1,125; Singapore got 1,303; South Africa got 802 (See World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO, WIPO Patent Report: Statistics on Worldwide Patent Activity.)

o   Nigeria has about 143 universities (federal, state and private) and none of them has prioritized the teaching and fostering of creativity and innovation. (NB: only one the Rivers State University of Science & Technology has the word “creativity” in its moto: “excellence & creativity”).

o       Nigeria has about 200 tertiary institutions (federal, state and private) and all of them combined have not tallied up to 100 high priority patents within the last 10 years.

o  According to a new market research report, 'World Mobile phone & Smartphone Market (2010 – 2015)', published by MarketsandMarkets, the total global mobile handset market was expected to reach US$341.4 billion by 2015 while smartphone sales will account for 75.8% of the overall mobile handset revenue at US$258.9 billion.

Of this total sales, about 120 million handsets would be sold in Nigeria within less than the same period. Not one Nigerian, DEAD OR ALIVE, would get a single dollar as royalties for any part or parts of a Smartphone invention or patent.

o       Nigeria has produced only one Nobel Prize winner (and that is in Literature).

o      Nigeria suffers chronic electric power shortages but the authorities have spent almost US$20 billion dollars in the last 20 years tackling the same problem and it has not been sorted.

o   The Federal Ministry of Education and most Nigerian universities in 2016/2017 budgeted more money (90% and above) to recurrent expenditure and less than 10% to capital projects. In lay language, this means that the ministry and universities would pay salaries rather than purchase tools/equipment/build infrastructure for the use of those who would earn the same salaries they have budgeted for would use to do the job for which the salaries would be earned!

I am tired of complaining!

I want to do something; so I am going to motivate you and I.

I have a simple message for you: do something to make your life positively affect someone else’s with your idea or product (indeed invention) in 2017.

If you lack any originally ideas of your own then read:

INVENTORS, INVENTIONS & INVENTIVE THINKING SHORTAGES
Key Reasons Why Nigeria Is Short Of Inventors
Cultural, Scientific, Educational, Environmental, Political and Other Factors Constraining Nigeria's Inventiveness and Inventive Endeavour 

To answer the opening question, Nigeria has than 100 inventors (in-country and abroad). This is abysmally low for a country with an estimated population of 180 million.

Like I said I am tired of complaining.

Tuesday, January 24, 2017

NEWS POST: Zuckerberg Charity Buys AI Startup To Battle Disease

Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg (L) and his wife Priscilla Chan pledged US$3 billion over the next decade to help banish or manage all disease ©John MacDougall (AFP)
A charitable foundation backed by Mark Zuckerberg and his wife said Monday it has bought a Canadian artificial intelligence startup as part of a mission to eradicate disease.

The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative did not disclose financial terms of the deal to acquire Toronto-based Meta, which uses AI to quickly read and comprehend scientific papers and then provide insights to researchers.

Meta capabilities will be unified in a tool made available for free to scientists.

"We are very excited about what lies ahead," Meta co-founder and chief executive Sam Molyneux said in a statement.

Zuckerberg and his doctor wife, Priscilla Chan, in September pledged US$3 billion over the next decade to help banish or manage all disease, pouring some of the Facebook founder's fortune into innovative research.

"This is a big goal," Zuckerberg said at a San Francisco event announcing the effort of the philanthropic entity established by the couple in 2015.

"But we spent the last few years speaking with experts who think it is possible, so we dug in."

In the field of biomedicine alone, thousands of research papers are published daily, initiative science president Cori Bargmann and chief technology officer Brian Pinkerton said in a post on the charity's Facebook page.

Meta artificial intelligence can analyze insights across millions of papers, finding connections and patterns at scales and speeds impossible for humans to match unassisted, according to Bargmann and Pinkerton.

"Meta will help scientists learn from others' discoveries in real time, find key papers that may have gone unnoticed, or even predict where their field is headed," Bargmann and Pinkerton said.

"The potential for this kind of platform is virtually limitless."

- AI at home -
Zuckerberg said last month that he built an artificial intelligence-imbued software "butler" -- named Jarvis -- that even plays with his family.

The Facebook chief took on the personal project last year, devoting about 100 hours to making a system inspired by "Iron Man" film character Jarvis as a virtual assistant to help manage his household.

Jarvis is not a physical robot, but an application Zuckerberg can access through his phone or computer to control lights, temperature, music, security, appliances and more.

The software learns his tastes and patterns, as well as new words or concepts, and can even entertain his one-year-old daughter Max, according to Zuckerberg.

Zuckerberg plans to continue improving Jarvis, and says he expects AI technology to improve greatly in the coming five to 10 years.

AI is getting a foothold in people's homes, starting with devices such as Amazon Echo and Google Home speakers that link to personal assistants to answer questions and control connected devices.

Image Source/Credit: Facebook/CZI
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Acquires And Will Free Up Science Search Engine Meta

Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan’s US$45 billion philanthropy organization is making its first acquisition in order to make it easier for scientists to search, read and tie together more than 26 million science research papers. The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative is acquiring Meta, an AI-powered research search engine startup, and will make its tool free to all in a few months after enhancing the product.

Meta could help scientists find the latest papers related to their own projects, while assisting funding organizations to collaborate with researchers and identify high-potential areas for investment or impact. What’s special about Meta is that its AI recognizes authors and citations between papers so it can surface the most important research instead of just what has the best SEO. It also provides free full-text access to 18,000 journals and literature sources.

Meta co-founder and CEO Sam Molyneux writes that “Going forward, our intent is not to profit from Meta’s data and capabilities; instead we aim to ensure they get to those who need them most, across sectors and as quickly as possible, for the benefit of the world.”

CZI did not disclose any of the terms of its acquisition of the Toronto-based startup’s tech and team, which was founded in 2010 and funded with US$7.5 million by investors, including Rho Canada Ventures and HIGHLINEvc. The startup formerly charged some users for subscriptions or custom solutions, but now the whole Meta product will be free. The acquisition will take some time to close first, though.

Cori Bargmann, president of Science, and Brian Pinkerton, president of Technology for the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, explain how Meta could be used, writing:

The potential for this kind of platform is virtually limitless: a researcher could use Meta to help identify emerging techniques for understanding coronary artery disease; a graduate student could see that two different diseases activate the same immune defense pathway; and clinicians could find scientists working on the most promising Zika treatments sooner. In the long run, it could be extended to other areas of knowledge: for example, it could help educators stay up to date on developmental science to better understand how children learn.

The acquisition aligns with CZI’s US$3 billion investment toward curing all disease. It’s already established the Biohub in San Francisco, which will host and fund medical research. Announced in September, one of the Chan Zuckerberg Science division’s goals is to build tools and technology for medical experts, along with bringing them together and building a larger movement for scientific progress.

In this case, because Meta has already established itself as a leader in the aggregation of research, it made sense to buy the company and distribute its tool rather than build something new. Zuckerberg and his wife’s organization have also made investments in startups as part of CZI’s Education push, including Andela, which preps African engineers for tech jobs, and Byju’s, an Indian video learning platform.

By taking Meta out of the commercial space and refocusing ans maximizing its value, CZI could solve one of science’s biggest problems for a much wider community. Simply put, there’s far too much research for any one scientist or even a whole team to keep up with. 2,000-4,000 papers are published each day about biomedicine alone, yet it’s hard to search across them or figure out which are the most reputable.

Image Source: Tech Crunch
Meta, formerly known as Sciencescape, indexes entire repositories of papers like PubMed and crawls the web, identifying and building profiles for the authors while analyzing who cites or links to what. It’s effectively Google PageRank for science, making it simple to discover relevant papers and prioritize which to read. It even adapts to provide feeds of updates on newly published research related to your previous searches. Here’s how it assists different parts of the research community:

·   Scientists can find the latest data and analysis on their areas of research, determine experiments that have already been performed that they don’t need to replicate and find new opportunities for investigation

·    Funding organizations like universities and foundations can get in touch with authors to back their future work, or spot trends of where breakthroughs are being made so they can funnel resources correctly

·    Students can ditch shallow Google searches that rely on exact term matches and SEO to rank results, and instead find papers that are most relevant to their research and are from commonly cited established scientists

·    Schools can ensure their curriculum are up to date and training students for the areas of science with the most potential for advancement

When originally announced, the flexible LLC status of the CZI was criticized because it diverged from the traditional structure of a charity. But the ability to acquire for-profit companies like Meta or reapply money it earns to its cause is exactly why Zuckerberg chose to form the philanthropic vehicle this way.

“Helping scientists will produce a virtuous cycle, as they develop new tools that in turn unlock additional opportunities for faster advancement” Molyneux writes. “The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative’s recognition of this “meta” effect is why Meta can be a key piece of the puzzle”.

The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative knows that even with the family’s massive fortune, it can’t fund every dimension of science. But if it can provide scalable tools that make every scientist more effective by freeing their creators from the hunt for profit, CZI can become a fulcrum for humanity.

Originally published (STORY 1) on AFP and (STORY 2) on TECH CRUNCH